Comments on: AdSense Alternatives for Publishers: What to Do After Losing Your Account

By: johncroks98

johncroks98 — Tue, 03 May 2016 02:49:22 +0000

I will be honest – I ditched ClickBank and AdSense altogether from my blog….reason being there are too many merchants who’s products and services either get banned or leave ClickBank and as for AdSense, it gives visitors to your website another route to click and leave your site. If you have affiliate programs and products already on your site, you are guaranteed to make more money with them than through AdSense, unless your are driving some serious traffic. As for InfoLinks, it just looks spammy and the keywords and ads that appear are not targeted most the time. I personally say just do away with ads and ad networks and focus on affiliate programs to monetize your blog that have one or few solid products to offer, because like I mentioned, you will make more money that way.

Regards
http://www.feedegg.net

By: howmate

howmate — Tue, 09 Feb 2016 11:14:30 +0000

Thanks for these list of Google adsense alternative, especially now that Google is being so strict on their publishers, banning accounts and disabling ads, i will surely consider few of these alternatives

By: antoxwoman

antoxwoman — Mon, 03 Sep 2012 23:41:54 +0000

Hello. Very nice info there!There are other cool sites that you should try to monetize your blog:1.- Adversal: (This is a very good adsense alternative, in fact it displays google adsense ads) WHD: (It displays text/banner ads, clicks and number of impressions count) eDomz: (It displays pop ups, competitive revenue sharing)Link: Kontextua: (Ads in images, Ads in texts, Banners, Sliders, Related Tags – Better than Infolinks)Link: You should try them, they all pay. I personally like them and they are best adsense alternatives.Enjoy. 🙂

By: peterchen

peterchen — Mon, 27 Aug 2012 08:01:10 +0000

Black, brown bag the jokerNo time, Louis Vuitton Outlet Onlineenergy or capital for every day you to dress collocation all sorts of different bag. Louis Vuitton Handbags On SaleThe joker black and brown bag can be your best! Such collocation can foil color and color level, Louis Vuitton Beltsand in some cases, can let a person finds everything new and fresh.

By: cbtempage

cbtempage — Sat, 18 Aug 2012 01:15:50 +0000

In reply to masonworld. masonworld Agreed...it definitely deserves a watchful eye!

By: LorettaOliver

LorettaOliver — Fri, 17 Aug 2012 17:30:50 +0000

I definitely think the piracy is bad and it’s great to see someone doing something about it, but is changing the algorithm really the right approach? Google seems a little power-happy lately and this is just another notch on the headboard for them. It’s a step towards Google claiming even more power, because these aren’t confirmed or convicted piracy issues – they’re just “we got these complaints and we’re going to punish these people” – at least that’s what I see if I’m understanding the algorithm update correctly.Unrelated side note – everything you said after “with great power comes great responsibility” was backgrounded by Spiderman music in my mind…..

By: masonworld

masonworld — Fri, 17 Aug 2012 05:10:46 +0000

In reply to cbtempage.

cbtempage Yep — I agree that piracy is bad, and I don’t feel all that strongly about this (yet). But these people are not proven to be pirates. No court has convicted them. All that Google is doing is counting notices. The notices don’t even have to be valid.Just because the outcome of googles action is good does not make the action they are taking OK.I also agree that my analogy is not perfect. Most porn is not illegal as you point out. But lots of stuff on the internet is closely related — escort services, hookers on craigs list, drug paraphernalia, etc. Will google target them next? Why not?Then what’s next?

By: cbtempage

cbtempage — Thu, 16 Aug 2012 22:40:45 +0000

Mark,Your comments on Google censorship are interesting.Keep in mind, though, that piracy is illegal, whereas most porn is not.Also, Google isn’t putting anyone in jail or enforcing the law. They are simply suppressing ranking for sites promoting illegal activities (i.e., no longer promoting them). The sites aren’t being taken down. People can still link to them and spread the word, if they want.But, you’re right…we need to keep an eye on it. I’m certainly no Google defender. I think they suck at some things. But, at least so far, I think I’m on-board with them for this one.c-

By: cbtempage

cbtempage — Thu, 16 Aug 2012 22:40:45 +0000