Comments on: Article Marketing Software: A Look Back at a Defunct SEO Strategy

By: brett electronics gadgets

brett electronics gadgets — Thu, 21 May 2009 05:06:22 +0000

I read abotu one guy who uses voice dictating software to re-write articles. pumps out heaps a day, possibly a pretty good idea?

By: Kent F

Kent F — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 23:25:52 +0000

Do follow SBM sites/PR:
Slash-9 (mostly tech); Digg-8; Propeller – 8; Furl – 7; Backflip-7; Hugg-7; Mixx-7;Ma.gnolia-7; Redditt-7.

By: Mark Mason

Mark Mason — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 20:29:00 +0000

In reply to Kent F. Rewriting existing quality content in your own voice is a great approach for systems like this. Well, there are two questions. Is the link dofollow or nofollow AND what is the authority of the resulting page containing the backlink. That is what really matters.

By: Kent F

Kent F — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:51:12 +0000

Mark and all – I’m wondering if anyone can determine any SEO evidence of directory submitting vs. social bookmarking. Digging an article or submitting to Redditt or wherever, vs. submitting to a directory with a pr of 6 or so? Full of questions today… 🙂

By: Kent F

Kent F — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:44:38 +0000

Thanks – another interesting factor is… with a solid spinner and some minor re-writing to start – you could plug plr in – and go to town with it.

By: Mark Mason

Mark Mason — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:57:30 +0000

@Kent — Jon Leger thinks it does not matter too much, but I think that spinning completely addresses this. And the spinner in this product is really solid.

By: Kent F

Kent F — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:54:12 +0000

Hey Mark – looks great. It seems we usually begin discussing the “duplicate content” issue when we talk directories – which the spinner should take care of. However, I do sometimes wonder if Google cares, or is it simply a backlinking method to be in so many directories?