Comments on: SEO Competition Analysis: Why Counting Competing Pages Is the Wrong Metric https://www.latenightim.com/seo-number-of-competing-pages-is-the-wrong-measure/ Building Internet Businesses With Affiliate Marketing One Night At A Time Fri, 03 Apr 2026 12:46:51 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Mark Mason https://www.latenightim.com/seo-number-of-competing-pages-is-the-wrong-measure/#comment-1790 Thu, 07 May 2009 20:32:04 +0000 http://www.masonworld.com/?p=1556#comment-1790 In reply to Justathought.

@Justathought — agree. Problem seems to be that common sense is in short supply.

]]>
By: Justathought https://www.latenightim.com/seo-number-of-competing-pages-is-the-wrong-measure/#comment-1789 Wed, 06 May 2009 21:11:17 +0000 http://www.masonworld.com/?p=1556#comment-1789 I think the content of this post if common sense personally. Naturally, the pages with the most authority ( significant backlinks) will win. Also, you are the first for the phrase “elvis aaron presley collectible necktie” because there are only (9) pages that are really competing for that EXACT phrase NOT 1900.

-Signed
“First time reading one of your post”

]]>
By: Preben https://www.latenightim.com/seo-number-of-competing-pages-is-the-wrong-measure/#comment-1787 Sat, 11 Apr 2009 02:20:22 +0000 http://www.masonworld.com/?p=1556#comment-1787 There are many ways of doing keyword research, and the only way to determine if what you are doing is right or wrong, is to see if it actually works.

I actually wrote a post about this on my blog today, which you can take a look at here: Keyword research tips

It’s generally about why you should use the “allintitle:keyword” command in google, and how to take advantage of it.

P.S. I have completely redone the design on my blog, and decided to link here, as this is one of the few blogs I bother to read on a regular basis ;o)

]]>
By: Mark Mason https://www.latenightim.com/seo-number-of-competing-pages-is-the-wrong-measure/#comment-1786 Fri, 03 Apr 2009 23:12:58 +0000 http://www.masonworld.com/?p=1556#comment-1786 In reply to Doug Younkin.

It is definitely true that G can do anything that the want for any reason. And, they have lots of resources. However, I personally think that 3WL is a low profile operation, and that the likelihood of G taking specific action against 3WL is low. However, I don’t really know — anything is possible.

If I could only choose one service, it would be 1WL due to the flexibility of the system and the number of links you can get.

Some of the best engineers in my department are physics guys — mostly solid state quantum mechanics types.

Thanks Doug.
Mark

]]>
By: Doug Younkin https://www.latenightim.com/seo-number-of-competing-pages-is-the-wrong-measure/#comment-1785 Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:21:10 +0000 http://www.masonworld.com/?p=1556#comment-1785 Mark,

I’ve heard that 3-way links may eventually be caught by Google as they improve their algorithms. In that case, 1-way links should be the safest for the long run. What is your opinion comparing 1-way and 3-way links? Thanks for the analysis.

Doug (I’m an engineer too, actually a physicist working as an engineer)

]]>
By: Mark Mason https://www.latenightim.com/seo-number-of-competing-pages-is-the-wrong-measure/#comment-1784 Wed, 01 Apr 2009 14:35:27 +0000 http://www.masonworld.com/?p=1556#comment-1784 In reply to Jeff Sargent.

Jeff;

No problem — I fixed your previous comment. Thanks for your comments on the post.

This traffic thing is a bit tricky too, because you really need traffic that will convert — not just any traffic.

So, my recommendation is always to break it down. If you need 100 visitors per day, where do you want them to come from. It there a clear call to action once they reach your site. If search is the source, are you targeting the right keywords (high OCI if appropriate, etc).

All traffic is not created equal….

]]>
By: Jeff Sargent https://www.latenightim.com/seo-number-of-competing-pages-is-the-wrong-measure/#comment-1783 Wed, 01 Apr 2009 14:09:00 +0000 http://www.masonworld.com/?p=1556#comment-1783 Hey Mark,

I made a mistake in my previous comment and I want to fix it.
In the last sentence I said “because I know it’s now BS”.

What I meant to say is “because I know it’s not BS”.

Sorry.

Later,
Jeff Sargent

]]>
By: Jeff Sargent https://www.latenightim.com/seo-number-of-competing-pages-is-the-wrong-measure/#comment-1782 Wed, 01 Apr 2009 14:03:36 +0000 http://www.masonworld.com/?p=1556#comment-1782 Hey Mark,

The biggest hurdle I have to overcome is the lack of getting traffic. I think that’s probably the biggest hurdle most marketers have. There are so many self-appointed gurus out there proclaiming to have the latest and greatest book on SEO it makes me want to puke.

I want proof. Proof that they know what they are doing and that after I spend my hard earned money on their product that if I do exactly what they tell me to I’m going to get more traffic.

I can go right now and right a book on how to get backlinks just by doing a little bit of research. Just because I wrote a book does that mean I know what I’m talking about. NO! The problem is all the information I got from my research was bogus. It may sound good to the uninformed person, but to the trained SEO expert, they know it’s garbage.

I just wish someone would create a product for less than $497 and would truly tell you how to get more traffic to your site, without leaving out their little secrets that they are using to generate thousands of visitors a day. All they really care about is the next dollar they are going to stuff into their pockets.

I’m done venting now.

That’s why I come to your blog to read because I know it’s not BS. Thanks for being truthful to your readers.

Later,
Jeff Sargent

]]>
By: Kevin Bidwell - Internet Super Stud https://www.latenightim.com/seo-number-of-competing-pages-is-the-wrong-measure/#comment-1781 Wed, 01 Apr 2009 07:04:47 +0000 http://www.masonworld.com/?p=1556#comment-1781 Good article Mark. Thanks for letting me know where I can pick up the Elvis tie. I still tear up a little every time I think of him. He died too young–just like “3” Dale Earnhardt.

]]>
By: Mark Mason https://www.latenightim.com/seo-number-of-competing-pages-is-the-wrong-measure/#comment-1780 Wed, 01 Apr 2009 04:37:43 +0000 http://www.masonworld.com/?p=1556#comment-1780 In reply to Don.

@Don — Wow. That many? Man. Guess I need to count again. LOL

Thanks for that catch. Updated the post to correct the typo.

]]>
By: Kristy https://www.latenightim.com/seo-number-of-competing-pages-is-the-wrong-measure/#comment-1779 Wed, 01 Apr 2009 04:18:32 +0000 http://www.masonworld.com/?p=1556#comment-1779 Great post Mark!
It’s amazing how easy it is to get carried away with the next big trick or system.
Honestly, if you believed all of the hype, internet marketing (and online business in general) is the most convoluted, secretive, competitive and impenetratable industry on the planet which noone makes any money from!!
I’ve lost count of the number of “must-have” business models and systems I’ve come across, especially in recent times.
One thing’s for certain, you can’t buy common sense “in a box” and it lasts a lot longer than “a limited time”!!
Oh well, more money for the rest of us willing to trust ourselves I suppose!!
Keep up the good work.

Cheers,
Kristy

]]>
By: Barry https://www.latenightim.com/seo-number-of-competing-pages-is-the-wrong-measure/#comment-1778 Wed, 01 Apr 2009 03:23:08 +0000 http://www.masonworld.com/?p=1556#comment-1778 Thanks Mark,

I also have heard about low competition keywords being easier to rank for, but it does make sense that you still need to put in the work to get it ranked high. Thanks for your article its a great reminder.

Barry

]]>
By: Mark Mason https://www.latenightim.com/seo-number-of-competing-pages-is-the-wrong-measure/#comment-1777 Wed, 01 Apr 2009 02:51:59 +0000 http://www.masonworld.com/?p=1556#comment-1777 @Steve — you are welcome, sir. Don’t feel badly. We are all still learning because G is changing the rules every day. That is what makes this exciting.

@Carolyn — Glad you liked it.

@Joe — ‘Sup? I love it when you drop by man. Love that latest vid from you man.

@Steve — Glad you liked that Adobe thing. That has been true for a long time.

]]>
By: Don https://www.latenightim.com/seo-number-of-competing-pages-is-the-wrong-measure/#comment-1775 Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:12:58 +0000 http://www.masonworld.com/?p=1556#comment-1775 Great Post but I think you meant to say that there are over 6 BILLION people on this planet.

]]>
By: Carolyn Cordon https://www.latenightim.com/seo-number-of-competing-pages-is-the-wrong-measure/#comment-1773 Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:25:57 +0000 http://www.masonworld.com/?p=1556#comment-1773 Hey Mark, interesting stuff here. I’m still learning, but the learning is easier with people like you!

]]>
By: Steve https://www.latenightim.com/seo-number-of-competing-pages-is-the-wrong-measure/#comment-1776 Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:43:03 +0000 http://www.masonworld.com/?p=1556#comment-1776 Outstanding! The section on Acrobat Reader made me chuckle, but it real does illustrate the power of authority and backlinking.

]]>
By: Normal Joe https://www.latenightim.com/seo-number-of-competing-pages-is-the-wrong-measure/#comment-1774 Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:04:12 +0000 http://www.masonworld.com/?p=1556#comment-1774 Good basic stuff right there man! Can’t argue with it, it’s great to know the basics lol.

I love it man. Keep pressing the realness dude.

]]>
By: Steve https://www.latenightim.com/seo-number-of-competing-pages-is-the-wrong-measure/#comment-1772 Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:03:28 +0000 http://www.masonworld.com/?p=1556#comment-1772 Thanks Mark. I’m still learning the proper way to do SEO – and see conflicting techniques every day. I appreciate your straightforward approach and explanation of the logic behind it! I’m tired of hearing others say “do this because I say it works”. I need the reasons behind the idea – thanks for providing that.

]]>